Chris Weaber — Orthopedic Medical Device Regulatory Consultant
Founder, Principal Consultant, Engineer
ARC helps medical device companies bring orthopedic and arthroplasty products from concept toward FDA clearance with practical regulatory strategy, product development, testing, and validation—keeping projects on time, on budget, and hassle free.
With over 14 years of expertise in orthopedic New Product Development, I’ve developed strategies that include expert planning to ensure projects stay on time and on budget. I also specialize in navigating the complex landscape of FDA clearances, ensuring that innovative medical devices reach the market safely and efficiently. My approach is rooted in realism, conscientiousness, and a solution-focused methodology that has led to the successful clearance of multiple products, including groundbreaking material technologies and first-in-the-U.S. designs.
29+ Years of Engineering, Quality & Regulatory Experience. I hold a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Rutgers University and bring over 29 years of engineering, quality, and regulatory experience to the table. My background spans capital equipment engineering, materials technology development, and medical device innovation.
I began consulting for medical device companies in August of 2023 with my company, Arthroplasty Regulatory Consulting.
Orthopedic Implant & Arthroplasty Expertise:
FDA 510(k) Clearance & Regulatory Strategy
Orthopedic Implant Development (Knees, Hips, Ankles)
Sterilization & Validation Testing Compliance
Cross-Functional Team Leadership & Project Management
Patent Development & Intellectual Property Strategy
Completion of Training Curriculum for FDA Third Party 510(k) Review
27+ Medical Device Clearances. I have supported the successful FDA clearance of more than 27 medical devices, including orthopedic products, innovative material technologies, and first-in-the-U.S. designs.
A First-Time-Right Approach to Medical Device Safety. My mission is to ensure product safety and compliance, passing the “Grandma Test”—if it’s not safe enough for my grandmother, it’s not safe enough for the market.
Supporting Orthopedic Medical Device Innovators. I collaborate with orthopedic companies for FDA clearance expertise, universities and labs developing new products, and surgeons pioneering innovative materials and designs.
Let’s connect if you’re looking to navigate regulatory challenges, streamline product development, or bring innovative medical devices to market.
Patents & Publications
Electroactive Polymer Smart Material US and International Patents:
Orthopedic Patents:
Electroactive polymers: US7952261B2, EP2347459B1, US9553254B2 TW201126377A, US20120126959A1, US20130044049A1, US20130207793A1, US20140368440A1
ISTA:
US10624753B2 -Locking system
US20170128097A1 - Broach holder tool with reduced rasp moment
USD1016291S1 – Femoral Component
US12318300B1 – Tibial insert with variable articular surface
USD1016293S1 – Knee baseplate
USD1016292S1 – Knee insert
Contributing Industry Representative: Epperson RT, Mangiapani D, Bloebaum RD, Hofmann AA. Bone ingrowth comparison of irregular titanium and cobalt-chromium coatings in a translational cancellous bone model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020 May;108(4):1626-1635.
2024: Cement Adhesion Testing IBED TiN Coating vs. Uncoated Ti6Al4V
2023: Fretting/Corrosion of Metal Dual Mobility Insert Taper with and without IBED TiN coating
2022: Knee Simulator Wear Performance of CoCr and IBED TiN-Coated Femoral Components Against UHMWPE
2022: FEMORAL CLOSURE FATIGUE OF IBED TiN COATED WROUGHT TITANIUM FEMURS COMPARED TO CoCrMo FEMURS
2022: SCRATCH HARDNESS OF CoCrMo COMPARED TO AN IBED TiN COATED Ti6Al4V SUBSTRATE
2019: Micromotion evaluation and comparison of a new cementless tibial baseplate
Ready to Move Your Medical Device Forward?
Submit an inquiry to discuss your orthopedic or arthroplasty medical device, FDA 510(k) strategy, product development, testing, or validation needs.